There isn't an easy way to extract individual messages and you aren't going to want to delete the entire mailbox or database.ĬlamXAV can work with Apple Mail to move infected messages to a quarantine mailbox which the user can then inspect and empty. There is a big problem involved in trying to check an e-mail database that doesn't store them as individual files (e.g. ClamAV started out as such software and there are some add-ons list on this page under Third Party ClamAV Tools. There are some, but mostly used by e-mail servers to prevent your ever receiving infected e-mails. You would have to click on a link or open an attachment for anything bad to happen and there are other means of preventing harm from doing that. I don't believe either scans incoming e-mail, but there are currently no threats to macOS from simply reading an e-mail. Malwarebytes scans take fare less time to do a manual scan because it isn't looking at every file on your hard drive that it can read the way ClamXAV does.ĬlamXAV does check for Windows and Linux malware if that's important to you, but if you are running Windows on your Mac it's best to install Windows malware software in that partition or VM for accurate results. They are basically looking for the same malware types so you won't find a lot of differences there.ĬlamXAV allows for a daily schedule scan which Malwarebytes has not added yet.īoth do quick scanning of selected areas where malware is known to exist, but ClamXAV v3 that just came out yesterday now does this for the entire hard drive. I frequently collaborate with both developers and have been somewhat involved with the design and testing of both apps for many years now.Īs far as features are concerned, both web sites seem to adequately explain such features so that you can compare them for yourself and they both have trial versions which will tell you exactly what their user options are. I have seen issues if both are attempting to access the same new or changed file simultaneously, but your experience could be different. I've always used both ClamXAV and Malwarebytes for Mac (to include the earlier apps that it's based upon) without issue as long as only one of them has background scanning (Real-Time or Sentry) enabled. For another reason, see #10 in the ClamXav FAQ :-) "Should I get rid of my other virus scanner and just use ClamXav from now on?" Have you paid good money for it? If so, and you have no pressing reason to dump your other scanner, then I would honestly have to say "no".Let me start with the last question. To me (but let me mention my lack of objectivity again), that's not an advantage…it's a must. Sophos Anti-Virus has an on-access scanner. This not only detects, but also _prevents_ infection. Aaargh! An on-access scanner examines each file system object as it is accessed (hence the name on-access), and can block access to dodgy files before they are used. If it was, congratulations! You're already infected. With an on-demand scanner, you can then scan your computer – which generally takes quite a while – to see if anything dodgy was installed as part of the process. Imagine you install some new software, which may unravel all sorts of other components out of its package (which needn't follow Apple's rules, of course), and download a whole load of stuff directly off the web, and generally litter your Mac with new items. And you'd better do _that_ part properly, because it becomes, well, part of the OS kernel itself. And to do that properly, you need a kernel driver. To deal with malware properly, you need an on-access, or real-time scanner. That can be useful, but it only _detects_ malware. When you want to scan something, you can. ClamXav – fairly sure I am right here – is just a gaaihpcrl front-end for using the ClamAV engine for on-demand scans.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |